Prof.Omata: The WHO guidelines came in March 2015, and then our APASL guidelines were made and accepted in the journal Hepatology International. So, it will be published online in a few weeks.These guidelines are for global preventions and treatment of hepacellular carcinoma and cirrhosis strategies. So, I think this targets and is trying to comprehend and cover all the areas of the world. In contrast. APASL is more specific to the Asian areas - and it is evidenced based. So the aims are the same, but there are some differences.
Prof. Omata: I talked today about this issue. The guidelines include so many things, so I will just touch a little bit upon it. In other words, about treatment indications. I judge the WHO guidelines do not include many guidelines for patients to be treated. Rather, it recommends watching the patients. In contrast, the APASL guidelines are based on the evidence available, recommending more patients to be treated, especially by the extent of fibrosis. In other words, this guidelines from the WHO are for everybody, even in countries where HBV DNA detection is not available, or a FibroScan facility. Those areas should also be included in the WHO guidelines. Therefore, those are the differences between the two.
Prof. Omata: Well, today’s meeting was for specialists - to educate the people who treat the patients. So, the APASL guidelines are, as I said, meant for the Asian areas such as China, Japan and other countries - and also, it is evidence based. It is more precise. It is more updated. So, these APASL guidelines can be used in daily practice by physicians living in Asia. Whereas, WHO guidelines try to cover not just Asian, but America, Europe, and Africa. So, I think that is a big difference between the guidelines. I belong to APASL - I think it should be used by the hematologists in Asia.